The Apple Australia site says that iPads will be available in late April May. Well, it’s officially late April. Where’s my iPad!
*Update. iPad orders have been pushed back a month outside of the US. Makes the (potentially) over-priced eBay option look better than ever.*
Funnily enough (that’s a term my mum used to use, i’m not so sure it’s correct grammar “funnily”?) the site also mentions the unbelievable price. What is funny about that statement is that no one has any idea what that unbelievably new price is going to be. No one that can say, anyway.
It’s pretty amazing that there’s such hype in this country about a device that has no fixed release date, very few details about available models, and which nobody knows a thing about the 3G capability, not to mention the fact that all the ruminations about video iChat point to an updated release (no doubt within 6 months).
Still, i’ve got a deposit down and i’m in line for the top of the line model (whatever that happens to be).
I’ve spoken to a lot of people about this device, and i’ve been describing it as “the best computer for your mum”, ever. Of course if your mother is a 30 something technology writer for a National newspaper, that description doesn’t apply. Mine isn’t, and so for my 50 something mother, i think this machine is perfect. Here’s a few points that i’ve had on my mind as a rationale…
It’s pretty simple (and meant to be)
It does one thing at a time. My mum can only manage about one thing at a time on her macbook pro. But the ability for her to be able to physically do more makes her run into trouble, and get confused watching anyone else use her machine. The lack of multi-tasking (actually there is multitasking in OS4 but it’s not real) is a perfect way for her to be more immersed in what she’s doing, while she’s doing it. Lack of multi-tasking is a feature for my mum.
Touch is intuitive (duh!)
All you have to do is look at the way that it’s portrayed in walkthrough videos and ads, this device is super simple to use. Everyone has fingers (sorry to the fingerless?) and it’s easy to walk them around a screen and point at things that interest you. Sure there’s gestures and multi-finger functionality but that stuff is mainly optional, and as you get more comfortable with one finger touch, these things will make my mum feel like a power user. The popularity of the iPhone among a very wide demographic has shown that touch is a very natural way to interact.
It’s a bit fancy
Although an internet luddite, my mum likes to show off a bit. When i set her up with Skype, she showed all of her friends like she invented it. The newness and flashiness of the iPad will make her want to use it around her friends, this meaning that mum and her buddies are online more. Sharing and surfing and watching and creating with friends of all ages can only mean better, more diverse user bases and more eyeballs
It’s “available at an unbelievable price”
Who knows what this even means for us (Australians), but if it truly is a great price then i think the usual barrier to entry with Apple products could be close to eradicated. It’s a shame that you’ll need a computer to activate it, but any machine will do the trick, and then sit gathering dust while mum plays with her shiny new toy.
It’s a toaster!
Well it’s not really a toaster is it, but it should be considered an ‘appliance’. It will sit in the lounge room or the kitchen (the bedroom?) not resigned to a special room for ‘corm-pyu-ting’. This is a good thing, with more digital integration in everyday lives, probably less television-time, and more looking at your son’s Flickr photos.
It makes content more fun
I can see my parents buying newspaper and magazine subscriptions on their iPad, for sure. Dad will find it more compact to grasp an iPad on the toilet as he reads (or probably watches) the sport pages, mum will get richer media for her hollywood gossip, dad’s golf magus will include interviews (probably in higher res than his crappy SD foxtel) and it should all come down the pipe automatically in a way that is way more fun to consume and share not having a convoluted way to seek it out in the first place will be the key.
My parents might start to understand what my job is
I’ve always been described as the son that “works with computers”. It’ll be nice for them to be a bit closer to integrating with things that i do for a living. They might just start to get it
I love this device even though i’ve not yet touched it i’ve only spent a short time with it (we’ve got one at work doing the rounds), but I really lament the lack of a front facing camera. I think being able to Skype is one of the things that my mum got most excited about when i set her up with her macbook. This, for me, is almost a deal-breaker. I’m sure it will come and iPhones are already being used as remote bluetooth cams, but the more abstracted that gets the less likely my mum is to do it. It’s a shame, but i’m sure we will see it in the next revision from the looks of all the “iChat” references in the 4.0 software.
I’m still waiting, and i’m waiting with baited breath, Mum doesn’t know it yet but i i’ll be swapping her laptop for an iPad when they’re arrive. I think she’s going to love it, i just hope she shares it with dad.
Before Avatar and the mad 3D crazy that is sweeping the world, i went to see Up in 3D and was super impressed by it’s subtle and tasteful use of 3D. After watching the previews before the film and being surprised that there was so much 3D production going on i’ve started looking into the use of 3D on the web. If you’ve ever looked into it, you’ll know that it’s not easy to find any half decent examples around, those red/cyan glasses are pretty hard to use and they don’t work for everyone, not to mention that most of the examples on the web are from old SD content made in the 80′s. Given the current rapid trend, It now looks like YouTube is getting on board and this example is the best implementation that i’ve seen so far.
Click the video to view in HD on youtube.
The HD version is really good quality and the options to choose between any possible implementation of 3D colouration via the drop down caters for any possible combo of glasses and styles available to a standard computer screen. The option of ‘cross-eyed’ 3D is also pretty cool, so that just by crossing or squinting your eyes you may be able to achieve the effect without glasses. It didn’t work for me, but it’s a cute experiment.
Hopefully we keep experimenting with this colourised stop-gap approach while the world (and all of our content) get’s ready to upgrade all our screens again once proper polarised (or even native) 3d becomes available to consumer sets and monitors. Plasma/LCD/LED/HD/FULL HD/3D/ let’s hope it never stops.
Click the image for a larger version
Oh, and you’ll need some red/cyan glasses to demo any of this stuff properly, the cross-eyed thing doesn’t really work (not for me anyway). Go get some glasses.
I’ve been attempting to make the PVC Steadicam featured on this site. It looks pretty hacked up, but the results look pretty impressive, and it seems like a relatively easy build.
I’ve been out and got most of the tools and materials that i need and after about 30 minutes i had got surprisingly further than i thought i would. The gimbal is in place and the threaded bar and wooden weight is attached. The gimbal seems to work pretty well so far although i couldn’t seem to get the same thickness of PVC in the example. I think this is going to be my major problem. For now though it seems to be holding together ok.
The inner PVC coupling that hugs the skate bearing isn’t as tightly huggy as i would like and i think i’m going to have to come up with a better way to attach these two pieces together, as this join is where most of the weight is going to be concentrated. I’m thinking bigger nuts that cover both the PVC and the bearing to hold them i place.
The hardest part of this job is going to be building a mount onto the top of the threaded rod to attach the camera to. The example site doesn’t have instructions on how he built his. I’m thinking affixing some sort of tripod head to a piece of wood is going to be the go. I’ll keep this post updated with results as i go.
*************update wed 4th************* Just got a bunch of washers to use as weights for the slat of wood at the base. I’ve picked up about 38 of them, which worked out at about $15 including the bolts. This has been the most expensive part of the whole thing so far. All the PVC only cost me about $8.
I’m not sure they’re actually going to be heavy enough, but we’ll see. I’m assuming they will need to be *about* the same weight as the camera, and they’re definitely not that, but then again they’re at the *long* end of the rod, so maybe that makes they’re weight proportionally more than the shorter, top end. This is what the dude used in the reference site by the looks of it too – fender (mudguard) washers.
I’m a self-confessed and utterly obsessed early adopter, band-wagon-jumping, gear-head. This is something that im try to settle down on, but after being a Pentax guy for about 4 years I’ve finally sold / traded in all of my gear and switched to a Canon system. This is where i’m going to stay, safe in the comfort that i’m using a really good quality system and i’m compatible with all my friends. This is my story…
I originally picked Pentax when i was working at Sputnik, we had CR Kennedy as a client and my CD and i got a great deal on the K10D back in the day. It was touted as the best camera Pentax had made in 20 years and it probably was. It did everything i needed at the time and was a nice slide back into the world of SLR where i had been vacant since my days as a photography assistant for Nick Osborne at Osborne Imaging. After an unfortunate accident at a VJ Xmas party the K10D was retired for a new model, the Pentax K20D which was a bit faster, a bit bigger and a bit higher resolution. Then came the dawn of the Video DSLR and Pentax had an answer for me there with the K-7. After getting well-stuck into this scene, investing in a few lenses and being very comfortable with using the Pentax system for many years i was pretty happy… but something incide me was never completely convinced that i was walking the right path.
Everywhere around me people were using these fancy Canons and Nikons, and although i was proficient with my Pentax, i couldn’t help being just a bit jealous of their gear (and their ability to share gear with one another). One of the reasons i got the Pentax K-7 was it’s ability to shoot 720p HD video, but my biggest gripe with the K-7 was that although you could manually control the aperture, it would automatically ramp the shutter speed to keep the light consistent once you set it. This caused a few problems; Not being able to maintain one set exposure when moving in and out of light sources seemed a bit amateur and then not being able to avoid flicker from the refresh speed of lights when they matched the camera was the killer. I have some tungsten lights that i use for interview and portrait setups and the K-7 always seemed to match the refresh rates and caused a really nasty flicker unless i set the camera to automatically set the iso in movie mode (when then changed the exposure when they lights changed). For me, the tipping point was seeing all the great results my friends were getting with their Canons, It was all a bit much. I’ve now taken the plunge.
I decided to sell all of my Pentax gear, 2 camera bodies, 4 lenses (and a trusty old 3 chip MiniDV camera that i’ve had for ages) and just start buying Canon. After a months worth of trading between friends, selling on Gumtree.com.au and eBay i’m finally left with no more Pentax in my life, and a week ago i headed down the road and picked up a Canon 7D kit with the 15-80mm lens, a 30mm f1.4 Sigma, a 50mm f1.4 sigma and a Canon Speedlite 580EXII flash. I feel like i need a longer zoom coming from having an 18-200 which granted wasn’t the best quality but was a good all-rounder, but the Canon L Series 70-200mm seems a little decadent after getting all this stuff. Xmas is just around the corner though. All said, done and purchased, I feel like a new man.
First of all, the 7D feels like a big solid chunk of quality. It’s a fair bit heavier than the Pentax, but i don’t mind that as i’m totally strong. It’s taken a while to get used to a new layout and all new controls. The Pentax had a great still-shooting setting (P) which would allow you to set an aperture and it would auto-adjust the shutter, or set the shutter and it would auto-adjust the aperture. A bit like a combo of av and tv modes on the fly. The canon doesn’t seem to do this in the same way, but i’ve gotten used to shooting full manual now, as the metering is very accurate and the controls are nice to use. Below is my favourite shot from Friday night, this guy is the cleaner at work, he’s got a lovely smile and a great face. I have no idea who that crazy scot is behind him though.
I’ve never really shot with an external flash before, but have found myself needing one more and more. After playing around in the lounge room, i’ve resulted in a bouncy way of achieving nice, natural light while using the flash. This purchase really was inspired by the amazing results that my friend Ty gets with his flash, he’s opened my eyes and i’m totally on board now.
One massive advantage that the Canon’s have is that the movie mode is fully integrated into the camera and so instead of switching to 1 movie mode that does everything for you, the movie mode can be enabled on any other shooting mode than the camera offers. This is an absolute godsend and very intuitive, allowing a bucketload of versatility. There is a dedicated switch on the back of the camera to switch between stills and movie mode and a button for enabling live view in stills mode, or on/off rec in movie mode. You can still hit the shutter and take a still shot while shooting video though. Dave has been getting some amazing results out of his 5DII and we’ve been going back and forth talking about the merits of Canon’s range and the available lenses. Obviously the best advantage of shooting video on cameras like this is the fact that you can achieve beautiful images if you’ve got the right lenses and know how to use them, getting gorgeous short focus shots that look more like film than the movie mode of a stills camera. One of the main disadvantages is the shakiness that is hard to avoid when hand-holding these camera. Places like Red Rock Micro and Zacuto (among others) have some great gear attempting to alleviate this issue and i’m hoping to try out some of that stuff one day. But for now, i’ll just shoot pancake sunday(below) in slow motion and that should hopefully make my jittery hands look a bit less jittery.
I reckon i’ve wanted these prints for 10 years. Has it really been that long? They arrived today and they’re now at the framers. Can’t wait to get them back next week and put them up.
I’m not a car nut, but i really liked these prints and this docco taught me a lot about how JD produces his work. Which i totally love, and the randomness of his art is what i really love.
Just got a bunch of washers to use as weights for the slat of wood at the base. I’ve picked up about 38 of them, which worked out at about $15 including the bolts. This has been the most expensive part of the whole thing so far. All the PVC only cost me about $8.
